Wakeup CALL to INDIAN Reality Shows :- Dimpy Dumps Rahul Mahajan Basted After Physical Abuse ?

 

Rahul Mahajan surely knows how to hog limelight. He earned instant celebrity status with his flirtatious ways in Big Boss 2. After lot of guesswork and speculations he chose to marry Dimpy Ganguly who participated in the reality TV show ‘ Rahul Dulhaniya Le Jayega.Rahul married Dimpy inspite of people telling him that it’s not right to marry within 2 -3 days of his uncle’s death.He too defended her when media came up with reports of bikini shoots and her sleazy hot item numbers.But the million dollar question is – Is this wedding just a farce? Will they repeat the Rakhi Sawant episode?

For the time being, Rahul is taking Dimpy to Maldives for Honeymoon.

 Its not the Rahul who is at fault. the fault is of Dimpy who has played with her own life having done marriage in the reality show with the knowledge that the person with whom she has to marry has doubtful hostory in ragards to married life. rahul has just repeated the act of non-humen with Dimpy which already he has done with his first wife Shweta. So here i want to appeal that everyone should select her/his life partner with 110% seriousness. Life is not a reality show.

Vaishnavi

Inspite of knowing his story she took risk of marrying... Few ppl always need experience to realise.. now she has realised.

ashir

i completely agree with ashok.........

Joyal

I think, the indian people should banned the reality shows stuff in india. This is the waste of time, the new generation will repeat the same kind of stuff in the future.
NDTV Imaging has earned money.
Rahul Mahajan has earned money too and enjoyed 3/4 months with the girls and last by dimpy.
I know, there is the issues with the girls who came in the reality show for the popuplarity but i don't think so they should come.
Before some time, rakhi sawant has done the same stuff with ILESH.
However, i just want to say is that just oppossed to these kind of stuffs...

amol

rahul mahajan is a dirty fellow.The girl should have thought before taking such a crucial decision.

texthim21

what else u can expect from this a******...

Rafiq S

Congrats....Dimpy hope u got the reward yeh toh hona hi tha!!!!!! think now its time for Rahul Dulhaniya Le Jayege Season-2.... Shame on u Rahul the persons who attended ur marriage are "FOOLS" nice trick to enjoy legal sex.

Man

DIMPY HAS GOT HER BEST REWARD FOR THE GOOD OR BAD SHE DID FOR HERSELF.ITS NOT ABOUT REALITY SHOW.....ITS ABOUT CHICHOORA..... MAHAJAN. IF SOMEONE ASKS ME ...WHATS THE OPPOSITE GENDER OF RAKHI SAWANT....ITS CHICHORRA MAHAJAN...............BUT THERE IS NO END......CHICHORRA WILL GET A NEW SWETA...DIMPI OR PIMPI.......BUT WE ANE OBSSESSED WITH EVEN ONE....

gautam

whatever rahul mahajan has done with his previous wife or doing with current wife is not good. somebody should take a legal action aginst him or teach him how to behave with a women.

Krupaa

I don't understand why girls behave as if they don't know anything..
It seems most of these girlz have very very very short memory..
And i don't have any sympathy with "dimpy" .. coz it was her choice to marry him.. she must have done all for publicity..

vinayak

it's too bad fpr our culture & socity

Sonia

This is very disgusting about Rahul....This was his second chance to prove himself but nothin has changed him ...He is a Complete "FAKE"...Dimpi has already given him a chance now she should take some serious action....

VICTOR

i say that even god gets angry when we do not follow his basic rules you have heard only one side of the story through media .This is issue between husband and wife why third person interfere so what if the marriage was through through reality show but after all it was real and both should understand the depth of the reality give time she will know what he likes and does not like and he also will.

Soumya

every one is blaming rahul and dimpy ..btu indirectly wr are the one who stand behind all this we gave them publicity n fame so here they are........well done rahul n dimpy

ajay

Rahul is a one more example of persons. who misuse popularity gain by their parents. At least history says same. media should not be highlight such type of person

vaishali

he is a totally fake person i think dipy knows him very well . she got reward for her decision

tamanna

rahul has not done anything new...........dimpy had come for popularity.........which she got after marrying rahul and now she has earned even more popularity after this domestic abuse.........well there are few ppl who learn from others mistake......and there are few fools who commit those same mistake and learn and i guess dimpy is just one of them

mahesh

It is not rahuls fault has he did not get the right girl after is 2nd marraige...it happens with all indian guys as indian girls want more money and bliss.......as indian women today are harrased for so many reasons and rahul mahajan is highkighted because he is a popular guy,,,if it was a lay man nobody will bother...

swati

Good that his father is not alive to see his son doing all these things.... its so cheap.... i agree with one of the comment above people or responsible authority should stop reality shows like this.... specially fixing up marriages... seriously government should take proper action on shows like this and specially on people like this....

Huge Financial Corruption Taken By Karnataka CID Basteds of INDIA Goverment BullShit of Karnataka goverment ??

Huge Financial Corruption  
Taken By Karnataka CID Basteds 
of  INDIA Goverment BullShit of 
Karnataka goverment ??

Bangalore: The Karnataka high court has indicated that it would quash the two First Information Reports (FIRs) filed against godman Swami Paramahamsa Nithyananda in Bidadi police station if the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) failed to chargesheet him within four weeks.

The indication came after justice Arali Nagaraj on Friday issued an ultimatum to the CID to either file the chargesheet or a final report in the matter within four weeks.

The judge was hearing the petition filed by Nithyananda seeking the quashing of the two FIRs, including one on rape. The matter has been posted to August 20 for final hearing.

Investigating officer KN Yogappa submitted that he was yet to chargesheet the godman as he could not collect evidence for various offences registered against the swami.

The government counsel further submitted to the court that they needed some time to record statements of Nithya Vimalananda and Nithya Gopika, both of whom were residing abroad, to ascertain if the godman had committed any offence under Section 377 of IPC on unnatural sex. One of the two was likely to arrive in India soon, the court was informed.

Yogappa submitted that no statement could be recorded for offences under Section 376 of IPC on rape as Tamil actor Ranjitha, whose alleged sleaze acts with self-styled godman Nityananda triggered off a public outcry, has denied any sexual relations with him and termed the video footage aired by television channels as “morphed”.

In a statement to the CID, Ranjitha rejected charges of sexual harassment by Nithyananda and said the woman shown on the video was not her. She denied any sexual relations with the swami and said that she had “only visited Nithyananda’s room once or twice”.

Yogappa told the court that he had sought permission from the Centre to rush two officers abroad in connection with the probe, and this would require time.

The judge said though enough evidence had been collected for offences under Sections 295A and 506 IPC, material was yet to be collected under the other two sections slapped against the godman.

Dirty & Valagar INDIAN NRI MEN in WORLD ?

Marriage in India, Marriage procedures in India, Marriage laws in ...

I am an NRI. My marriage took place in the USA. Can I file for divorce in India? A: This is a complicated legal question as each case has peculiar facts ...
British officials have been dealing with several cases of young Indian-origin women being forced into marriages against their will, but recent cases show a sharp increase of men facing such ordeals.

Britain has set up a Forced Marriage Unit (FMU) that deals with cases of British citizens being forcibly taken to the Indian sub-continent and married against their will for cultural, immigration or family reasons.
The unit has rescued several young women, but it is estimated that most cases go unreported. Latest figures show that during the last year, the unit registered a 65 per cent rise in the number of calls from men.
The unit received the most calls from men linked to Pakistan, followed by India and Bangladesh. It also received calls from British men with links to the Middle East, Africa and eastern Europe.
A spokesman said: "The calls we receive are the tip of the iceberg. It now seems likely that men account for one in five of all the forced marriages that take place to British citizens."
In June, the FMU took a call from a young man in Leicester whose family had allegedly locked him in his bedroom after discovering that he was gay.
He told the FMU that his family were downstairs, discussing whether to take him to India and either kill him, abandon him there or marry him off.
Last year, the FMU gave advice and support to 1,682 men and women regarding suspected forced marriage.
More than 220 calls and emails involved male victims, up from 134 in 2008. As of the end of May this year, there have been 88 calls from men for help.
Foreign Office Minister Jeremy Browne said: "Boys and men who are forced into marriage find it harder to ask for help than women, but we are urging males affected by forced marriage to speak out and seek the help that is available to them."
He added: "Of course, women make up the majority of forced marriage victims, and over 1,400 reports of women facing this abuse were dealt with by the FMU last year.
But people often don't realise that men can be victims of forced marriage too."


India a vibrant diverse country accepts personal laws of its citizen. Every citizen of India is entitled to have his own personal laws inter alia in the matter of marriage and divorce. Matrimonial disputes include issues related to child custody as well as child protection law, ancillary/ financial property where either spouse is in India or has assets in India.

Feel free to post your query for assistance on your matrimonial dispute by clicking on Send a Query

Hindus are governed by Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 which provides for the conditions of a Hindu Marriage where under the bridegroom should be of 21 years and bride of 18 years, they both should be Hindus and should not be within the degree of prohibited relationship or sapindas, neither party should have a spouse living nor any party should be subject to recurrent attacks of insanity or epilepsy, either of them should not be suffering from mental disorders or should not be unfit for marriage and procreation of children and both should be of sound mind and capable of giving valuable consent.

Divorce under the Hindu Marriage 

Act 1955 can be obtained on the grounds of:

• Adultery
• Cruelty
• Desertion for two years
• Conversion in religion
• Unsound mind
• Suffering from venereal disease and/or Leprosy
• Either spouse has renounced the world not heard for 7 years
• No resumption of co-habitation for one year after the decree of judicial separation
• No restitution of conjugal rights for one year after decree for restitution of conjugal rights Husband guilty of rape sodomy or bestiality
• And if after an order of maintenance is passed under the Hindu Maintenance and Adoptions Act or the Criminal Procedure Code there has been no cohabitation for one year.

As regards the maintenance and adoption of children, Hindus are governed by The Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act.

Muslims are governed by their personal laws under which "Nikah" (i.e. marriage) is a contract and may be permanent or temporary and permits a man 4 wives if he treats all of them equally. To have a valid "Nikah" under the Muslim Law, presence of a Qazi (Priest) is not necessary. Merely a proposal in the presence and hearing of two sane males or one sane male and two sane female adults, all Muslims and acceptance of the said proposals at the same time constitute a valid Nikah under the Muslim Personal Law. A husband can divorce his wife without any reasons merely by pronouncing thrice the word "Talak". However for a Muslim woman to obtain divorce certain conditions are necessary.
For Parsees there is a Parsee Marriage & Divorce Act, 1939 which governs the provisions of their marriage and law and for Indian Christian there is a Indian Christian Marriage Act 1889. Persons of any religion who get married under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 are governed by the said act.
There are certain penal provisions also in the Criminal Procedure Code providing for the maintenance of the wife and punishment for bigamy.

VARIOUS ENACTMENTS
(click on the following links for details)

1. The Indian Divorce Act, 1869
2. The Special Marriage Act, 1954
3. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
4. The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956
5. The Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956
6. The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961
7. The Foreign Marriage Act, 1969
8. The Family Courts Act, 1984
9. The Muslim Women (Protection Of Rights On Divorce) Act, 1986
   

You can send us your query on any kind of matrimonial/divorce issue on query@nrilegalservices.com or click on Send a Query.

Australia Fucks 15,000 Indian Students to INDIA ?

Around 15,000 Indian students in Australia could be forced to return home under a revised skills list that is set to become the mandate for visas and permanent residency to that country from July 1. Minister for Overseas Indian Affairs Vayalar Ravi has urged Canberra to exempt existing students from the new list.

Australia has slashed the existing Skilled Occupations List (SOL) from 400 skills to just 181 for vocational courses and jobs, which are prerequisites to acquire permanent resident status and student visas.

Ravi, who visited Australia recently and raised the issue, is confident the Australian government will not turn down his plea, though he said it hasn't committed to his request to exempt the existing students from the new skills list in order to let them finish with their courses and for permanent residency.

'I asked the Australian ministers to implement the list prospectively and not retrospectively... I have asked them to give our students two and a half years' time to find a sponsor and employment,' Ravi told IANS, after returning from a week-long trip to Australia where he met Foreign Minister Stephen Smith, Trade Minister Simon Crean and Immigration and Citizenship Minister Chris Evans.

Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs (MOIA) Joint Secretary G. Gurucharan told IANS that 60 percent of the Indian students will not be affected by the revised list, and of the remaining, 30 percent will be given a transition period of two and a half years to either find a job or sponsor to acquire permanent resident status.

He said those in trouble are the remaining 10 percent, or around 10,000 students, who arrived in Australia on student visas with neither vocational nor language skills only intending to pick up jobs and secure permanent residency.

However, Ravi is confident that the authorities will not let down the students. He said: 'I am confident and hopeful that Australia will not disappoint our students though they have not committed to us on anything... They will look into the matter.'

Gurucharan said the ministry had reasoned with the Australian authorities that despite prior knowledge that these students lacked vocational and language skills, Australia had issued them student visas and so now they cannot be forced to leave.

'But they also had a good argument in their favour that when they gave these students visas, it was only a student visa and so under the new list they cannot be given permanent resident status. But still the minister (Ravi) spoke on their behalf to the Australian authorities and we are hopeful,' he added.

Also affected by the new SOL are at least 5,000 other students. They were hit when the Australian government ordered closure of 34 of its privately-run institutes in the last few months for failing to meet the laid down standards. Many more institutes are expected to follow suit.

The High Commission of India in Australia had early this year warned students planning higher studies in that country of the existence of several sub-standard institutions which do not meet the standards set by the Australian federal and state governments.

The state government in Victoria is currently auditing 41 privately-run educational colleges. Further, the federal government has mandated that all education providers and institutions delivering to international students need to re-register by Dec 31, 2010, so that the government can ensure they meet the mandated standards.

During his visit, Ravi also held talks with the Victoria Premier John Brumby and asked him to take initiatives to help the Indian students continue with their courses in recognised institutes without being affected by the new list and also help them find employment under the state-sponsored immigration policy.

'I tried to impress upon them that our students should not lose out on opportunities, they have spent a lot of money and energy to get there but when institutes are being shut down by the government, what will our children do? I am hoping they won't disappoint our children,' Ravi added.

100 crore Loss on Ravan and Kites why ???

The janta review of Kites and Raavan was swift and cruel. F-L-O-P. Flop. That’s real bad news for the common producer of both films – Reliance Big Pictures. Sources say the company has lost upwards of Rs 100 crore on these films. By its current scale of performance, Raavan looks to sink lower than the other mega-budget dud – Kites.

Both films had extensive pre-launch promotions. Alas – promotions ensure that a film has a good opening over the weekend. That’s it. After that, it is the content of the film itself which will make it swim or sink.  Beating poor reviews and word-of-mouth ratings, Kites managed a good opening weekend, netting in Rs 30 crore.

Raavan has collected less than Rs 20 crore at the close of its opening weekend. This week onwards, Raavan has a clear run with no competing releases. Yet, analysts predict it will sink further.  Nothing can salvage Raavan with its below average opening of 50% across the country.

Kites and Raavan were expected to follow Raajneeti’s rocking show at the box office.  Instead, the films have become Bollywood ki Aag. That’s something, even by Bollywood standards of expecting the most unexpected.

Was it the actors?  Raavan is Abhishek Bacchan’s third film with Mani Ratnam. After Yuva and Guru, expectations were sky-high from Abhishek Bachchan. (We tend to dismiss Delhi 6). What the janta saw was largely dismissed as hamming and posturing, amateurish and naive.  Questions raised on faking the much-vaunted dive didn’t help.

Hrithik was appreciated in Kites for his good looks (which the camera made love to, framing him in tight close-ups and bare torso scenes). Jai faltered, Hrithik didn’t.

Scintillating Barbara Mori looked pretty in Kites. So does Aishwarya in Raavan. Luminous, floating around in the forest, long curly drenched hairpiece and carefully crafted no make up look.  So we’ve heard of the chemistry between the stand-in Sita and the shrieking baddie. We think back to the mock fight when the same pair landed on a bed in Guru and phuuuuuus- zilch. Aishwarya, I suspect, still looks hottest with Hrithik.  Hrithik and Barbara’s crackling chemistry and smouldering looks kept Kites ticking.

Both films are richly crafted and produced – sweeping shots, stunning locales, jungles, waterfalls, but where is the story? So Kites was painful and downright silly in the second half. With Raavan and its confusing plot (Beera is Raavan, Robin Hood or Veerappan), why does Vikram wear aviator glasses in the jungle (he’s a cop, they cost a lot, no?) and run slo-mo, etc, etc. The plot rests mostly in Mani Ratnam’s head.

To sum up, here’s what I am saying other filmmakers should avoid like the plague:

• Avoid bumbling actors who ham for the camera


• If your film is titled Raavan, don’t hope that Sita will see it through


• Get a lead pair who look hot together


• Let the story out of the director’s head and out there for the audience


• Acknowledge the use of stuntmen/women


• Don’t get Ma and Pa to defend your film


• Think of a strategy to counter word-of-mouth ratings and reviews


• Don’t let others in Bollywood poke fun at your expense and ask RGV and KJo to take their tweet battles offline

Read my colleague Rummana’s review of Raavan here. ‘Abhi-Ash are insufferable’, she says. And here’s the trailer.

Now vote here and tell me what you think is the reason for Raavan’s no-show:

3 reasons why Raavan flopped:

There is NO storyAbhishek's non performanceToo vague

Huge Financial Corruption in Nityananda CASE ?? UpDated ??

The Karnataka High Court delivered its verdict on Swami Nityananda’s bail plea. The 32-year-old spiritual teacher and founder of the Dhyanapeetam, faces several criminal charges including that of rape and “unusual sex”.

12th June 2010: Swami Nityananda has got conditional bail but has been instructed not to teach or preach.

11th June 2010: Swami Nityananda gets bail on Rs 1 lakh bond. No witness against Nityananda in rape case.

30^th April 2010: When the CID was interrogating him, the swami’s shocking statement, “I’m not a man. There’s no way I could have indulged in sexual activities with women. Do a potency test on me,” gave a new twist to the  sordid saga.

21^st April 2010: Almost a month and a half after the sex scam broke out, Swami Nityananda was arrested from Himachal Pradesh’s Solan district. At the time of his arrest, the Bangalore police found Rs 3 lakh and 2000 dollars with him.

2^nd March 2010: The Swami scandal surfaced in March 2010 when a local channel aired video footage of the swami in a compromising position with a Tamil actress after he had retired from his ashram to live a life of “spiritual seclusion”.

After almost 50 days in jail, the decision on his bail plea will be taken today. Amidst allegations against Nityananda and all the controversy, some loyal devotees continue to hold onto their faith.

Swami Nityananda is not the only self-professed godman to be embroiled in a controversy; several others too have been in the news for all the wrong reasons.

Social media channels, specifically Twitter, was abuzz with quips about Swami Nityananda’s sex scandal. For an interesting flipside view to the Swami saga, check this link.

Stay tuned to FTP for the latest on the Swami Nityananda story and find more related stories here.

Huge Financial Corruption in Nityananda CASE ??

Can You Trust CID or INDIA Police ???

Oldest trick in the book ?? Get on, get off and 

get away with claims of faulty equipment ??

Too Smart in front of CID so making false 

comments to get rid of the case soo easily ??

wait Swami, after third degree torture from
CID/Police you won't feel MAN anymore.?
AhahaAhAhahaAhAhahaAhAhahaAhAhahaAh

Fuck the Basted Nityanada 

from INDIA ?

Huge Financial Corruption in Nityananda CASE ??

Can You Trust CID or INDIA Police ???

Huge Financial Corruption in Nityananda CASE ??

Can You Trust CID or INDIA Police ???

Huge Financial Corruption in Nityananda CASE ??

Can You Trust CID or INDIA Police ???

Huge Financial corruption in Bhopal gas Case ?

Bhopal gas tragedy: America's double standards, say some

Hours after a verdict drove home the point that justice, after 25 years, is nowhere on the horizon of a city left gasping for breath, America's reaction to the sentence in the Bhopal gas tragedy seemed tactless, even insulting. US Assistant Secretary of State Robert Blake said, "I don't expect this verdict to reopen any new inquiries or anything like that. On the contrary, we hope that this is going to help to bring closure, to the victims and their families."
The verdict was not unexpected. The court in Bhopal delivered the maximum sentence of two years in prison for eight Indian executives who faced charges of criminal negligence for the world's worst industrial disaster. Bail was granted immediately. 
Stung, India is now asking why a series of decisions by different governments and the Supreme Court allowed the case against Union Carbide to turn into one where the punishment is no greater than what's awarded for an ordinary road accident.
And as politicians, investigating officials and former judges once involved with the case offer differing versions of why they're not to blame, many activists are looking outwards -  to America - where the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is being dealt with so differently.  
President Barack Obama, criticised in different editorials for, initially not acting quickly or aggressively enough, spoke a different language on Monday. 
In an interview to NBC News' show "Today', Obama said he wanted to know "whose ass to kick" over the oil spill, adding that if BP Chief Executive Tony Hayward worked for him, he would have fired him by now over his response to the 50-day-old spill 
There is, to many Indians, especially those fighting for a quarter of a century for the rights of the Bhopal gas tragedy, much to envy and to counter, in the America on display for its own crisis versus Bhopal's. 
Eleven people were killed when British Petroleum's Deepwater Horizon rig exploded in Gulf of Mexico.  Close to 8000 died on the night of Dec 2 1984 in Bhopal, and in the years since then, the number has climbed to close to 20,000. 
The oil spill has caused extensive damage to marine life, birds and the US coastline in the states of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida. In Bhopal, 26 years after the gas leak, the soil and the water are still contaminated, with dangerously high levels of toxic chemicals, and thousands still suffering the aftereffects.
British Petroleum has already paid 69 million dollars, just as first installment for the damages caused. That figure could multiply several times, with the company's liability still being decided. In contrast, Union Carbide paid just $ 470 million in compensation for the deaths it caused. That's less than $500 dollars per victim, insufficient even to cover medical treatment costs for those who survived.    
When asked about the possible extradition of Warren Anderson, the man who headed Union Carbide at the time of the Bhopal gas tragedy, America's stand was clear.  
"As a matter of policy, we never discuss extradition," said Robert Blake.
A US court rejected a formal extradition request for Anderson in 2003, allegedly on the grounds that under US laws, only someone personally culpable for a crime can be extradited. Anderson did not fit the bill.
In the case of British Petroleum, America is launching a criminal investigation that may lead to prosecution of top executives.  
Double standards, say many, who say America is avoiding its responsibilities in a case where the facts speak for themselves.